Vision Payroll

The US Department of Labor (DOL) recently issued Administrator signed Opinion Letter FLSA2009-10. Although Opinion Letters only apply to the exact set of facts and circumstances presented in each case, they are a valuable aid in understanding current interpretations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Because the letter was apparently never mailed after it was signed, the DOL under new Secretary Hilda L. Solis has decided to withdraw the letter for further consideration. Therefore, this letter may not be relied upon as a statement of agency policy. It is possible that a different conclusion may be reached when the Opinion Letter is reissued.

In this Opinion Letter, the DOL confirmed that community members who coach athletic teams qualify as teachers under the FLSA. Although a teaching certificate indicates that an employee qualifies for the exemption, there is no requirement that a teacher possess a certificate to qualify. Further, “there is no minimum education or academic degree required” for the exemption. Coaches qualify as teachers if their primary duty is “teaching and imparting knowledge to students in an educational establishment.” Since these community members apparently do not provide other services to the school district and there is no salary requirement for teachers under the FLSA, the coaches qualify and are exempt from minimum wage and overtime requirements.

State laws may provide rules that are more beneficial to the employee and must be followed. The DOL may come to a different conclusion when it reissues the Opinion Letter after further consideration. Contact Vision Payroll if you have questions about this Opinion Letter.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has released Notice 2009-27, Premium assistance for COBRA benefits. Pursuant to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 or ARRA, certain involuntarily terminated employees are eligible for employer-provided subsidies to help pay for their Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) continuation coverage. Employers may then claim a credit on their Form 941 to be reimbursed for the assistance provided.

In recently issued guidance, the IRS confirmed that an employee “hired only for a limited period such as a seasonal worker or a teacher hired only for one school year” is considered involuntarily terminated for premium subsidy purposes if the employee works to the end of season or contract period, is not offered employment, and is able and willing to work. Contact Vision Payroll if you have any questions on the COBRA premium reduction credit.

The US Department of Labor recently issued Administrator signed Opinion Letter FLSA2008-11. Although Opinion Letters only apply to the exact set of facts and circumstances presented in each case, they are a valuable aid in understanding current interpretations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). This Opinion Letter discusses whether Assistant Athletic Instructors (AAIs) qualify as teachers exempt under the FLSA.

The facts are that AAIs “teach proper skills and skill development to student-athletes”; a bachelor’s degree is required although a master’s degree or equivalent experience is preferred. The AAIs spend more than half their time teaching “physical health, team concepts, and safety.” Although they work under a head coach, they also exercise considerable discretion and independent judgment.

The AAIs spend time on activities that don’t include teaching activities, “such as developing effective recruitment strategies, recruiting and following up on prospective students, researching and targeting high schools and athletic camps as sources for potential student-athletes, and visiting high schools and athletic camps to conduct student interviews.” Since they spend more than half their time on teaching activities, however, the non-teaching time is not determinative. Furthermore, the institutions of higher learning where the AAIs work would presumably qualify as educational establishments. Therefore, the AAIs would qualify as exempt from minimum wage and overtime requirements under the FLSA.

State laws may provide rules that are more beneficial to the employee and must be followed. Contact Vision Payroll if you have questions about this Opinion Letter.

The US Department of Labor recently issued non-Administrator signed Opinion Letter FLSA2008-13NA. Although Opinion Letters only apply to the exact set of facts and circumstances presented in each case, they are a valuable aid in understanding current interpretations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Unlike signed Opinion Letters, unsigned Opinion Letters do not “provide a potential good faith reliance defense for violations of the FLSA.”

This Opinion Letter discusses whether daycare instructors who spend a majority of their time teaching qualify as exempt teachers under the FLSA. The Opinion Letter stated “that the daycare center instructors [spent] a majority of their time teaching children between the ages of three and five a curriculum of basic reading, counting, and social skills.” The relevant State Department of Education did not license the daycare centers where the instructors worked, although they were licensed by the state’s Department of Public Welfare. The implication of this distinction is “that the state does not consider the day care centers to be providing educational services.” The Opinion Letter concludes that the instructors do not qualify for the teacher exemption since they do not provide elementary education under the laws of their state.

State laws may provide rules that are more beneficial to the employee and must be followed. Contact Vision Payroll if you have questions about this Opinion Letter.

The US Department of Labor recently issued Administrator signed Opinion Letter FLSA2008-9. Although Opinion Letters only apply to the exact set of facts and circumstances presented in each case, they are a valuable aid in understanding current interpretations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). This Opinion Letter discusses whether instructors in a cosmetology school are teachers who qualify for the professional exemption of the FLSA.

The instructors in the instant case are licensed cosmetologists in addition to being licensed as instructors by their State Board of Cosmetology. The school is licensed by that board and accredited by the National Accrediting Commission of Cosmetology Arts and Sciences. This accreditation qualifies the school as an “educational establishment”. Although the instructors do not have teaching certificates, their primary duty is “teaching and instructing students in cosmetology theory, as well as in the practical part of the curriculum.” This means that the instructors are “teachers of skilled or semi-skilled trades and occupations.” Therefore, the instructors qualify under the professional exemption of the FLSA.

State laws may provide rules that are more beneficial to the employee and must be followed. Contact Vision Payroll if you have questions about this Opinion Letter.

The IRS recently released Notice 2008-62 which states that teachers who receive pay over a 12-month period will generally not be subject to §409A. Technically, teachers who only work for 9 or 10 months but are paid over a 12-month schedule have deferred compensation under §409A since some pay is deferred from one calendar year to the next. Under proposed regulations to be issued under §457(f), teachers paid under such plans will be exempt from the §409A rules.