Vision Payroll

The US Department of Labor recently issued Administrator signed Opinion Letter FLSA2008-6. Although Opinion Letters only apply to the exact set of facts and circumstances presented in each case, they are a valuable aid in understanding current interpretations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). This Opinion Letter discusses whether a city that employs workers in a Water Treatment Plant may include on-call compensation received in a two-week pay period with other pay received in a two-week pay period for purposes of computing the overtime rate of pay to be applied to that period. An employee is paid $2.50 per hour for on-call time that is not considered hours worked under the FLSA. The employee may work overtime during only one week of two-week period. The city proposed including the on-call compensation with all other compensation received in the two-week pay period and dividing by the number of hours worked in that pay period to arrive at a regular rate of pay. For example, an employee earns $10 per hour, works forty hours in the first week and forty-five hours in the second week of a two-week pay period and also receives $100 of on-call compensation. The city proposed paying overtime based on a regular rate of $11.18 per hour. (40 hours X $10/hour) + (45 hours X $10/hour) + $100 = $950 total compensation. $950/85 hours = $11.18 per hour regular rate of pay for overtime purposes. The overtime premium under this method would be $27.95 or $11.18/hour X 5 hours X0.5 premium. If a one-week pay period were used, a regular rate of $12.22 would be used for the overtime calculation (45 hours X $10/hour) + $100 = $550 total compensation and $550/45 hours = $12.22 per hour. The overtime premium under this method would be $30.55 or $12.22/hour X 5 hours X0.5 premium. The FLSA uses a standard of a single workweek for calculating the regular rate of pay and does not allow averaging over two weeks even if the employee’s pay period is normally two weeks. Since “the specific hours for which on-call pay was earned are identifiable, the payment for on-call time must be attributed to the workweek in which the on-call hours occurred.” Therefore, the city must use the latter method to calculate the employee’s regular rate of pay and may not use a two-week period. State laws may provide rules that are more beneficial to the employee and must be followed. Contact Vision Payroll if you have questions about this Opinion Letter.

Thirty-six delivery men for various Vietnamese restaurants in New York City were awarded more than $4.6 million in back pay and damages in a recent case Ke, et al. v. Saigon Grill, Inc., et al., SDNY, 07cv2329 MHD, 10/21/2008. The court found that the defendants’ testimony was not credible as to hours worked by and wages paid to the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs had testified that they worked hours in excess of forty per week without receiving overtime pay and were not compensated at the minimum wage, both in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA); they stated that unlawful deductions from their pay were made by the defendants as supposed fines for things like late deliveries or failure to complete side work; they claimed entitlement to reimbursement for expenses incurred for bicycles and motorcycles used in the deliveries; they alleged retaliatory terminations for asserting their intention to pursue an FLSA complaint; and they sought additional pay under a New York state law that requires employees whose workday is longer than ten hours to receive “one hour’s pay ‘at the basic minimum hourly wage’”. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs on all these arguments and also ruled that the defendants’ failure to post any FLSA notices explaining the provisions of the law and the employees’ rights thereunder resulted in a suspension of the statute of limitations until the plaintiffs received notice of their rights. This equitable tolling doctrine allowed plaintiffs to claim back wages for a period of eight years, not the two or three years ordinarily allowed under the FLSA. Vision Payroll strongly recommends employers consult their labor law attorney to review their minimum wage, overtime, and deduction policies to ensure compliance with all applicable federal and state laws.

Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), employees must be paid a minimum hourly wage and an overtime premium of one and one-half times the regular rate of pay for hours worked in excess of forty per week. This is the one of a continuing series that discusses FLSA exemptions. The administrative exemption allows employees who qualify as “administrative employees” to be exempted from both minimum wage and overtime requirements. Earlier posts discussed the definition of an administrative employee. The following are examples of specific jobs that generally either qualify or don’t qualify the employee under the administrative exemption:

• Insurance claims adjusters qualify whether they work for an insurance or other type company.
• Financial services employees who analyze information, advise customers, market, service or promote the products qualify, but not those whose primary duty is selling.
• Employees who lead a team of employees “assigned to complete major projects for the employer”, even those without direct supervisory authority should qualify.
• Executive assistant or administrative assistant to a business owner or senior executive will qualify if the assistant has been delegated authority over significant matters.
• Human resources mangers who “formulate, interpret or implement employment policies” do qualify. Personnel clerks who screen applicants for minimum acceptable standards as set by others generally do not qualify.
• Management consultants who propose changes in a business’s operation qualify.
• Purchasing agents with authority to make significant purchases qualify even if the agents need consultation for unusually large commitments.
• Inspectors “along standardized lines involving well-established techniques and procedures” and those doing other ordinary inspection work do not qualify.
• Examiners or graders do not qualify, even if the employee has progressed to a point that reference to written standards is unnecessary because of acquired knowledge.
• Comparison shoppers who report prices to a retail stores buyer do not qualify, but the buyer who evaluates the information to set the prices does qualify.
• Inspectors and investigators in the public sector, including those involved in “fire prevention or safety, building or construction, health or sanitation, environmental or soils specialists” among others do not qualify.

Note that merely giving someone a title does not qualify the employee as exempt unless the duties and responsibilities that the job encumbers are also designated. State laws may provide rules that are more beneficial to the employee and must be followed. Contact Vision Payroll if you have questions about the administrative exemption.

Following an investigation, the US Department of Labor has filed a lawsuit seeking more than $5 million in underpaid overtime. The suit was filed against CEMEX, Inc., a Houston-based provider of cement and concrete products. Employees in Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Texas were allegedly underpaid overtime hours for piece rate and incentive bonus pay. The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requires that employees eligible for overtime be paid at one and one-half times their regular rate of pay, which should include most commissions, bonuses, and incentive pay. Vision Payroll provides a continuing series on the FLSA, but you should contact your labor attorney with specific questions on overtime hours and pay rates.

The US District Court for the District of Columbia granted summary judgment to the defendants in a lawsuit by two lifeguards seeking overtime pay. In Miroslav Ivanov, et.al., v. Sunset Pools Management, Inc., et.al., DDC, 07cv410 RJL, July 29, 2008, the two plaintiffs, Bulgarian citizens, alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) among other complaints. Plaintiffs and defendants agreed that the Ivanov brothers worked in excess of forty hours per week and were not paid an overtime premium. Defendant Sunset Pools Management, Inc. (Sunset) argued that it was exempt from the FLSA overtime requirement under the amusement and recreational exemption. The court found conflicting opinions within the Department of Labor as to whether a pool operator qualified under the instant exception, but ruled that the “undisputed evidence in this case demonstrates that Sunset is an amusement and recreational establishment.” The court also ruled that International Training and Exchange, Incorporated, “an international staffing firm that recruits foreign citizens for ‘work-travel’ opportunities in the United States,” was not the plaintiffs’ employer and therefore not liable under the FLSA. Contact Vision Payroll if you have questions on the FLSA and the amusement and recreational exemption.

Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), employees must be paid a minimum hourly wage and an overtime premium of one and one-half times the regular rate of pay for hours worked in excess of forty per week. This is the one of a continuing series that discusses FLSA exemptions. The administrative exemption allows employees who qualify as “administrative employees” to be exempted from both minimum wage and overtime requirements. An earlier post discussed that to qualify for the administrative exemption, an employee must “exercise…discretion and independent judgment” in significant matters. Discretion and independent judgment involve “the comparison and the evaluation of possible courses of conduct, and acting or making a decision after” considering various possibilities. Some factors are “whether the employee has authority to formulate, affect, interpret, or implement management policies or operating practices; whether the employee carries out major assignments in conducting the operations of the business; whether the employee performs work that affects business operations to a substantial degree, even if the employee’s assignments are related to operation of a particular segment of the business; whether the employee has authority to commit the employer in matters that have significant financial impact; whether the employee has authority to waive or deviate from established policies and procedures without prior approval; whether the employee has authority to negotiate and bind the company on significant matters; whether the employee provides consultation or expert advice to management; whether the employee is involved in planning long- or short-term business objectives; whether the employee investigates and resolves matters of significance on behalf of management; and whether the employee represents the company in handling complaints, arbitrating disputes or resolving grievances.” The regulations specifically state that other factors may also be considered in making the determination. Discretion and independent judgment generally require an employee to make decisions “free from immediate direction or supervision.” The decisions may, however, be reviewed by upper-level personnel or not followed at all. Neither means that the employee did not exercise discretion and independent judgment. The fact that several employees may perform similar work or work of the same level of importance is not necessarily enough to disqualify the work from requiring discretion and independent judgment. Types of work that do not require discretion and independent judgment “include clerical or secretarial work, recording or tabulating data, or performing other mechanical, repetitive, recurrent or routine work.” The fact that an employer may suffer “financial losses” if an employee fails to properly perform a job does not necessarily mean that an employee who performs that job exercises discretion and independent judgment. State laws may provide rules that are more beneficial to the employee and must be followed. Contact Vision Payroll if you have questions about the administrative exemption.

Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), employees must be paid a minimum hourly wage and an overtime premium of one and one-half times the regular rate of pay for hours worked in excess of forty per week. This is the one of a continuing series that discusses FLSA exemptions. The administrative exemption allows employees who qualify as “administrative employees” to be exempted from both minimum wage and overtime requirements. An earlier post discussed that to qualify for the administrative exemption, an employee’ s primary duty must be “the performance of office or non-manual work directly related to the management or general business operations of the employer or the employer’s customers.” Therefore “working on a manufacturing production line or selling a product in a retail or service establishment” does not qualify as an exempt administrative function. Examples of work that does qualify include “work in functional areas such as tax; finance; accounting; budgeting; auditing; insurance; quality control; purchasing; procurement; advertising; marketing; research; safety and health; personnel management; human resources; employee benefits; labor relations; public relations, government relations; computer network, internet and database administration; [and] legal and regulatory compliance.” The regulations specifically state that other duties not listed above may also be included in the duties of an administrative employee and that such duties may also be performed by employees who qualify under other FLSA exemptions. State laws may provide rules that are more beneficial to the employee and must be followed. Contact Vision Payroll if you have questions about the administrative exemption.

Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), employees must be paid a minimum hourly wage and an overtime premium of one and one-half times the regular rate of pay for hours worked in excess of forty per week. This is the one of a continuing series that discusses FLSA exemptions. The administrative exemption allows employees who qualify as “administrative employees” to be exempted from both minimum wage and overtime requirements. Only employees “employed in a bona fide administrative capacity” qualify for the exemption. Any employee who meets all the following tests shall be considered an “administrative employee” for this purpose: 1) The employee must receive a salary of at least $455 per week, not including board, lodging, or other facilities. 2) The employee’s primary duty must be “the performance of office or non-manual work directly related to the management or general business operations of the employer or the employer’s customers.” 3) The employee must “exercise…discretion and independent judgment” in significant matters. Future posts will provide further clarification of certain terms in the administrative exemption as well as provide other tests that may qualify an employee as an administrative employee. State laws may provide rules that are more beneficial to the employee and must be followed. Contact Vision Payroll if you have questions about the administrative exemption.

Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), employees must be paid a minimum hourly wage and an overtime premium of one and one-half times the regular rate of pay for hours worked in excess of forty per week. This is the one of a continuing series that discusses FLSA exemptions. The executive exemption allows employees who qualify as “executives” to be exempted from both minimum wage and overtime requirements. The fact that employee may perform both exempt and non-exempt duties does not necessarily disqualify the employee from executive classification under the FLSA. The determining factor is generally whether the employee directs other non-exempt employees and remains “responsible for the success or failure of business operations” or is merely directed by another to perform the exempt function or performs it for a certain period. “An employee whose primary duty is ordinary production work or routine, recurrent or repetitive tasks cannot qualify for exemption as an executive.” Generally, the ultimate deciding factor, based on the facts and circumstances of each case, is whether or not the employee’s primary duty is management. State laws may provide rules that are more beneficial to the employee and must be followed. Contact Vision Payroll if you have questions about the executive exemption.

Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), employees must be paid a minimum hourly wage and an overtime premium of one and one-half times the regular rate of pay for hours worked in excess of forty per week. This is the one of a continuing series that discusses FLSA exemptions. The executive exemption allows employees who qualify as “executives” to be exempted from both minimum wage and overtime requirements. One of the tests to be met is that an executive must be able to make “suggestions and recommendation [that] are given ‘particular weight.’” Among other factors to be considered are, “whether it is part of the employee’s job duties to make such suggestions and recommendations; the frequency with which such suggestions and recommendations are made or requested; and the frequency with which the employee’s suggestions and recommendations are relied upon.” The “suggestions and recommendations” should pertain to employees whom the executive manages. Occasional suggestions about co-workers are not sufficient to meet this standard. The “suggestions and recommendations” need not be the ultimate deciding factor or even the most important determinative factor to qualify as being given “particular weight.” State laws may provide rules that are more beneficial to the employee and must be followed. Contact Vision Payroll if you have questions about the executive exemption.